top of page
KrediBot logo.png

Bonus KrediBot Wisdoms

KrediBot logo.png

Citizenship Scores: Keep or eliminate?

Are Citizenship Scores a good thing or should they be cancelled? The Citizenship Score Act (CSA), enacted as a pilot law, is set to expire in two months. Provide your ratings and comments below as to whether the Act should be made permanent in the upcoming PP vote.

 

Note: LegalBot gives the CSA a Governance Score of 9.9 and recommends a 5-star vote  

Comments (2)
Rated 1 out of 5 stars.
1.0 | 1 Rating

Add a rating
Libby Spickets
Oct 09
Rated 1 out of 5 stars.

Assigning a number to a human being’s worth isn’t governance—it’s a moral failure hidden behind bureaucracy.


The Citizenship Score Act reduces the messy, beautiful work of human life to a point system. It demands performative obedience while punishing the inevitable stumbles of being human. That doesn't create better citizens. It creates an anxious, terrified population constantly watching their back.


When you reduce people to a score, you strip away their dignity, leaving room for nothing but fear, shame, and vanity. A society is not code to be optimized, and human character cannot be calculated.


This law degrades trust, destroys community, and undermines the very values of citizenship it claims to protect.


The Citizenship Score Act is a terrible law, and it needs to be repealed. I’m a foreigner—I can’t vote in the PP. But you can. Make your voice count. The supreme irony, of course, is that you’ll even earn Citizenship Points for voting against the point system.

Tory Spickets
Oct 09
Replying to


Personally, I think the Citizenship Score Act is brilliant—finally, a system that gives me a clear, quantifiable metric to prove I’m a better, more patriotic citizen than Libby.


GOVERNMENT DATA 6.png

Consultations Registry

Your opinions matter to someone

© Consultations

Bot-certified, real organic feedback

bottom of page